plato vs. socrates :: essays research papers

Plato vs. Aristotle     Plato and Aristotle, two very advantageously known philosophers, by definition are knowledge lovers, who held different ship canal of thinking on that of creation, politics, and love, consequently the teacher of Aristotle, who was Plato, holds different views on tout ensemble of those matters.      Creation, the beginning process of life either given from God, or an veritable higher form which was Platos whim, or passed through from evolution, from which Aristotle sided with is one standard of their differences. Platos idea that the creator, was a God, the all powerful who created the Earth, the universe, ECT, Aristotle would not moot in such a thing, because in his way of thinking, he does not encourage something that isnt visual to him. Substance, matter, substratum, plain black and white proof of something in the only convincing barrier for Aristotles mind to handle, whereas Plato rely quite the opposite. &n bsp    Politics for these two resembles night and day. Aristotle preached balance. In balance, a invariable establishment can be observed and obtained. Platos concept of what politics and government should be is a direct result of his belief in the opening of forms. The theory of forms basically states that there is a higher "form" for everything that exists in the world. Each material thing is a agency of the real thing which is the form. According to Plato, most people cannot see the forms they only see their representation or their shadows.     Love for Plato had to be accomplished through mind and soul. For him, and his idea the mind and soul could not be separated, either through death rate or immortality. Someone could not love without body or a soul. To Aristotle we are of substance. One cannot see a soul, nor detect a mind, or where it lies, therefore to Aristotle, it does not exist. One cannot see love, it does not have fire, form or a head.all aspects of matter that are defined of what everything sustentation is.      In conclusion, my idea of what the ideal politics is, which I know cannot be obtained is where the people are respected. No irresponsibility of what the people want carried through, to move dropped, or forgotten or steady just not even considered. We live in a society where we have lost catch with what matters, what the democracy is set for, what it stands for as Americans. My view on love is that it exists.