'Kafka’s The Metamorphosis\r'

'Many literary critics were both awed and confound with Franz Kafka’s brilliantly written yet absurd, and often, grossly surreal striving of writing. Die Verwandlung or The metamorphosis is Kafka’s longest work, almost resembling a novel, and is as well 1 of the most acclaimed. From the grade of Gregor, who woke up one morning to watch over himself transformed into an insect ( hammer), the readers croupe slowly see the exploration of an individual’s existence and the pain he experiences due to sensual isolation and other people’s indifference.Using a purely psychological outlook, it is easy to view The metabolism as a mirror of Kafka’s make demonsâ€for every artist is said to impart a portion of his self into his works. Thus, The metabolism may be Kafka’s own struggle with his past and present, a per give-and-takeal process that gradu every(prenominal)y made its take awayice to the writer’s conscious writings and gen uine into a nightmarish plot about the stirred up state of Gregor Samza who curiously transmuted into a physic totallyy hideous animal. This is wherefore Kafka stands to gain the empathy and compassion of viewers when the storey is told from the stand of Gregor.First, Kafka is a struggling writer early on in his life. He lived his life in emotional dependence on his p bents. There were mixed feelings of depend onual love and hate  and though he longed to marry, he considered  sex as dirty. By choosing Gregor as the main consultation who experiences the transformation, he elicits the empathy of readers even as he performs a lackluster life.(Franz Kafka. 1883-1924). In the story, Gregor Samza is the anchor that supports his family. He is a fairly successful salesman and earns enough to pay off his father’s debt and bring food on the table. He is the one who strives hard for the family’s upkeep.When the disaster happens to him and not to any member of the family, then, the repercussions are big(p)er. The pillar of their family is suddenly gone and they have to strive to go about their daily lives without his help. In fact, they have to fag the burden of seeing a horrible dick in their house and then to think that the creature is Gregor, back to pretending that their lives are normal, neertheless.Second, Kafka had no use of publishing any of his works.  He actually wanted it destroyed. It was his friend Max Brod who pursued its publication. Thus, Kafka, actually had all the liberty to create Gregor as the head of all his frustrations and dependency feelings. He gained all the outlet to passing play these emotions and then destroy it in the end. It gave a secondary feeling of relief to him. (Franz Kafka. 1883-1924).Lastly, Kafka felt a certain kind of shoddyness despite the rebellion he showed. Creating Gregor as the brunt of all his impotence gave an apt target for the same kind of impotence that Gregor had to be imbued with. .(Franz Kafka. 1883-1924).We grow reasons for Kafka’s way of telling the story because Kafka never worked as a traveling salesman nor even experient acting as a primary financier for his family. soon enough a parallelism can be seen between the two men, both before and aft(prenominal) Gregor’s transformation. Gregor knows his father’s ruthless temper, and with admiration for the old man intermingles fear. There are scenes in the story where the older Samsa demonstrates this merciless attitude towards his son because of the latter’s repugnant appearance.Mr. Samsa cruelly shoves Gregor into his populate using a walking cane, and during a nerve-racking encounter, pelts him with apples wherein an apple lodges into his insect back and begins to rot (Kafka 37-38). Nevertheless, it was through with(predicate) Gregor that Kafka was able to show how goodness permeates in everyone, scarce only when instances are happy and perfect. When things turn to worst, individuals holiday resort to a coping strategy that alienates the ugly and the useless.Putting Gregor as the member of the family that is transformed into an insect gives us a glimpse of how Kafka may have felt at times in his life. Apart from the refined and whole appearance, Kafka was depressed most of the time. It was known that he suffered from migraine, constipation, and boils, which are all products of pent-up stress and unhealthy emotions usual to those with troubled pasts  (â€Å"Franz Kafka”).No wonder that the bizarre dominated his form of expression, probably as a form of a release from the rigid normality that imprisons individuals into normalness. In fact, at that place is no other way of invoking from the readers such pissed feelings akin to the emotions of the writer than by using noble and graphic images resembling man’s outlandish nightmares.  because again, Kafka never wanted some(a) of his works published for the entire world t o read. Writing is sacred for Kafka, and a refuge from a seemingly menacing and achromatic world (Franz Kafka. Books and Writers).Gregor’s transformation into a beetle is parallel to Kafka’s acquiring of terbium. The animal(prenominal) abjection means the collapse of a person’s once important status and the revulsion of others. At first, loved ones react with grief whilst trying to be considerate to the afflicted one. In the long run, however, those with debilitating weaknesses are soon scorned. This long-time fear of being weak and being segregated translated into writing, while Kafka tried his topper to look normal even when recuperating.Kafka’s tuberculosis purportedly affected his writings in such a way that his stories show â€Å"fear of physical and mental collapse,” which was of course also seen in The metamorphosis (Franz Kafka). Further, the nightmarish plots pertain to â€Å"de gentlemans gentlemanization” as exemplified with Samsa’s metamorphosis into an insect. Even more frightening is the tack together of this dehumanization, wherein everything beautiful, even Grete’s kind-heartedness, comes to its fearful end.For some readers, The transfiguration is allegorical. Reading the story makes one constantly wish for a totally different conclusion, or if not, for some figurative message hidden behind the lines. Yet what happened in the story is totally literal and rude: Gregor died as a beetle, his death comes silently in the night. It is devoid of any melodrama or of any prominent revelations, so that the whole meaning or aggregate of the story is left for the readers to figure out. Kafka’s literature, The Metamorphosis included, have since served as windows into the late writer’s own life and soul: his experiences, fears and tribulations. His works are full of the complexities that are deemed as representative of the human existence, and most importantly, complexities tha t endlessly haunted the author until his end.Kafka stands to be redeemed of his supposedly ordinary existence, even if temporary, in the way he depicted Gregor. All the angst that Kafka go through in his life poured out on Gregor who had to pay the brunt of his disappointments. He made Gregor useless by transforming him into a hideous insect in order to mitigate his own uselessness.  It had to be Gregor because he was the breadwinner. When Gregor dies in the end, the violation is great because as Kafka writes it, that there is a strong weight lifted from the spirit of the family and their mourning is short.The story ends with the whole family driving into the countryside and their parents’ thoughts wondering about how to find a husband for Grete. There is a great sadness in the way Kafka decides to end his story because Gregor is not missed at all, but instead, his parents in effect(p) try to find ways of looking for a possible husband for Greteâ€a replacement for Gregor who was their breadwinner. In the final analysis, Kafka succeeds in getting the sympathy of readers as he wove his story until Gregor’s death.Works CitedKafka, Franz. Appelbaum, Stanley (trans.). The Metamorphosis and former(a) Stories. New York: Dover. 1996.â€Å"Franz Kafka.” In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. 7 declivity 2006. Retrieved Feb. 1, 2007 at:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Franz_Kafka&oldid=92749510â€Å"Franz Kafka.” Books and Writers. 2002. Retrieved Feb. 1, 2007 at:â€Å"Franz Kafka. (1883-1924).” Retrieved Feb. 1, 2007 at:http://www.levity.com/corduroy/kafka.htm\r\n'