Compare/contrast The Biological View Of Sexual Orientation With The Social Learning Perspective.

Running Head : intimate OrientationComparison between biologic exposition and fond nurture perspective on versed penchantNameUniversityCourseTutorDate : intimate orientation refers to emotions , romance as well as on the loose(p) attractions be expressed either to the members of the opposite sex kindred sex or both sexes . The APA suggests that inner orientation whitethorn also include wiz s personal and social personal identity element based on those attractions , behaviors expressing them , and membership in a confederation of new(prenominal)s who shargon them (Evans-Prichard , 1970 . The argument involving sexual orientation has always taken two dimensions on the ane side is the social learning theorist who claims that sexual orientations are learned discipline from ahead of timeish childhood . Some of th e factors involve in moldable one s sexual orientation are cited as parental compassionate or sexual abuse at an early power point in behavior .

These factors together with both(prenominal) adverse life events would shape one s individual sexual orientation (Laqueur 1990On the other side of the divide is the biological explanation of sexual orientation . Garnets and Peplau (2000 ) cite that Biologists claim that there are certain biological factors that are responsible for the development of one s sexual orientation . Although no single factor has been set , some of these factors are said to be related to the champion structure , antepartum hormones a! s well as genes . Biologists paramount view explains sexual orientation as biological phenomenon which involves mixed genetic factors influenced by the uterine environment of the child (Bem , 2000 . To the biologists whence nobody chooses to be either...If you want to get a wide-cut essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper